Annexation Plans and Regional Alarm
Israel’s push to annex parts of the occupied West Bank has escalated into a full-blown geopolitical crisis, with experts and Palestinian advocates sounding alarms over a coordinated strategy of demographic manipulation. A recent Al Jazeera report, emphasizing that ‘Jordan is next,’ reveals how annexation could institutionalize a ‘silent transfer’—a gradual, coercive displacement of Palestinians—potentially forcing a new wave of refugees into Jordan, a nation already strained by decades of hosting displaced populations. This development threatens to redraw regional boundaries and destabilize a key Middle Eastern ally, all while the international community remains divided on effective countermeasures.
Understanding the ‘Silent Transfer’ Mechanism
The term ‘silent transfer’ encapsulates a suite of policies designed to make life increasingly untenable for Palestinians in the West Bank, thereby encouraging their emigration without direct violence. Historically, this has involved the expansion of Israeli settlements, the demolition of Palestinian homes under discriminatory planning laws, the denial of building permits, the confiscation of agricultural land, and the fragmentation caused by the separation barrier. Annexation would elevate these practices from occupying powers’临时 measures to permanent Israeli law, eroding the legal recourse available to Palestinians. Human rights organizations, such as B’Tselem and Al-Haq, document how these tactics create a ‘reality of displacement,’ where economic collapse, restricted movement, and constant uncertainty push communities to seek refuge elsewhere—often in Jordan, due to cultural ties and historical precedent. The ‘silence’ refers to the absence of overt expulsions, masking what analysts describe as a form of ethnic cleansing by bureaucracy, with annexation serving as the legal capstone.
Jordan’s Historical and Demographic Vulnerability
Jordan’s entanglement with the Palestinian issue is rooted in the cataclysms of 1948 and 1967, which saw hundreds of thousands of Palestinians cross the Jordan River, many settling permanently. Today, Palestinians and their descendants represent a substantial portion of Jordan’s 10 million population, integrated through citizenship but also carrying a complex political legacy, including the traumatic 1970 Black September conflict. The kingdom already shelters over 2 million Palestinian refugees registered with UNRWA, alongside 1.3 million Syrian refugees, overwhelming its limited water resources, job market, and public services. Economically, Jordan grapples with high unemployment, soaring debt, and reliance on foreign aid. Any significant influx from the West Bank—estimates suggest tens of thousands could flee if annexation triggers systemic collapse—would exacerbate these strains, potentially igniting social unrest and challenging the monarchy’s authority. The phrase ‘Jordan is next’ directly implicates this vulnerability, suggesting that Israel’s annexation is not an end in itself but a step toward resolving the ‘Palestinian problem’ by shifting the demographic burden onto Jordan, a scenario Amman has repeatedly warned could violate the 1994 peace treaty.
Geopolitical Calculus and Regional Domino Effects
Beyond demographic engineering, annexation carries profound strategic implications that explicitly target Jordan’s security and sovereignty. The annexation proposals focus heavily on the Jordan Valley, a fertile strip bordering Jordan that Israel has long coveted for defensive depth and agricultural control. Seizing this area would give Israel unprecedented leverage over Jordan’s eastern border, potentially enabling future demands for territorial adjustments or security concessions. Regional analysts, including those from the International Crisis Group, argue that by fortifying its hold on the West Bank, Israel could isolate Jordan, weaken its position in any future peace talks, and even encourage internal instability among Palestinians within Jordan, thereby preempting opposition to Israeli policies. This domino theory posits that after consolidating the West Bank, attention turns to ‘solving’ the Palestinian presence in Jordan itself, through pressure to revoke citizenship or absorb more refugees, thereby completing a de facto transfer without formal agreements. Such a move would shatter Jordan’s delicate demographic balance and provoke widespread backlash, potentially destabilizing one of the region’s last remaining buffers against chaos.
International Paralysis and Jordan’s Diplomatic Offensive
The global response to annexation has been characterized by condemnatory rhetoric but a dearth of concrete action. The United Nations, European Union, and Arab League have consistently declared annexation illegal under international law and a death knell for the two-state solution, yet sanctions or meaningful pressure remain elusive. The United States, under the Biden administration, has rhetorically opposed annexation but has not tied it to military aid or diplomatic consequences, while previous Trump-era policies effectively greenlit Israeli claims. This impunity emboldens the Israeli right-wing coalition, which views annexation as a historic opportunity. In contrast, Jordan has mounted an urgent diplomatic campaign, with King Abdullah II convening emergency meetings with European and Arab leaders to stress that annexation would constitute a ‘major violation’ of the peace treaty and trigger ‘uncontrollable conditions.’ Jordan has also bolstered border security and sought economic aid from the IMF and World Bank to build resilience, but these measures are insufficient without a firm international guarantee against forced migration or further territorial demands.
Toward Prevention: The Imperative for Global Action
Averting the prophesied ‘silent transfer’ demands more than words; it requires enforceable mechanisms to hold Israel accountable and support Jordan’s stability. The international community must revitalize the two-state paradigm through a credible, time-bound peace process, while simultaneously imposing targeted sanctions on entities involved in annexation. Crucially, Jordan needs immediate, substantial economic and military assistance to withstand demographic shocks, coupled with diplomatic shields against future territorial coercion. The ‘Jordan is next’ warning is not merely hyperbole but a calculated assessment of Israel’s strategic trajectory, where annexation serves as a catalyst for regional reordering that sacrifices Palestinian rights and Jordan’s sovereignty. Without decisive intervention, the Middle East risks a cascade of displacement and conflict, confirming that the West Bank is merely the first domino in a series that could topple regional stability. The world must act now to prevent a silent catastrophe from becoming an open disaster.
Image Source: Google | Image Credit: Respective Owner
