Google has avoided being forced to sell its Chrome browser after a U.S. judge stopped short of ordering a breakup in one of the biggest antitrust cases in decades. While the court spared Chrome, it placed new restrictions on Google’s business practices, signaling tougher battles ahead in AI search and digital advertising.
Key Points from the Ruling
- Chrome Not for Sale
Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google will not be required to divest its Chrome browser, despite earlier findings that the company maintained an illegal monopoly in online search. Federal prosecutors had sought harsher remedies, including banning Google from the browser market, but Mehta said they had “overreached.” - Restrictions on Deals
Google can no longer strike or maintain exclusive distribution agreements for Chrome, Google Assistant, or its Gemini app. However, it may continue to pay device makers for product placement, with the judge warning that a complete ban could create “downstream harms.” - Investor Relief
The decision was welcomed by financial markets. Google’s shares rose in after-hours trading, reflecting investor confidence that the ruling leaves its core business largely intact. - Watchdog Criticism
Consumer advocates sharply criticized the outcome. The American Economic Liberties Project called it a “complete failure,” arguing that Google was found guilty of monopolization but allowed to retain its dominant position. - Focus on AI and Ads Ahead
Prosecutors had shown that Google spent billions to remain the default search engine on Apple and Samsung devices, helping it secure about 90% of the U.S. search market. Mehta warned that remedies must prevent Google from extending its dominance into AI-driven search. The company still faces a separate case later this year over its control of digital advertising technology.
Image Source: Google | Image Credit: Respective Owner
